Facilitators, Barriers, and Opportunities to Implementing Sexual History Screening and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Sexual history screening (SHS) is recommended to determine risk for acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and eligibility for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). SHS and PrEP are underutilized, sequential screening, and prevention practices. This study aimed to understand factors impacting the implementation of SHS and PrEP at a multi-site federally qualified health center (FQHC) in Connecticut. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, semistructured interviews were conducted on Zoom with primary care providers (PCPs), medical assistants, clinical leadership, and PrEP navigators. Convenience and purposive sampling took place via email until thematic saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis was conducted. Twenty-two participants were interviewed for this study. PCPs lacked knowledge and reported limited or no use of SHS to determine patients' level of HIV risk, which may explain why most PCPs relied on patients to request PrEP. While PCPs perceived organizational support to prescribe PrEP, clinical staff were unaware of structural resources. Lastly, participants described a vertical trajectory of influence from external sources (policies and insurance) to time allocated to appointments that limits their ability to implement SHS and PrEP, further complicated by the electronic health record and disparities in structural resources across clinical sites. This study provides foundational evidence for future research on implementation strategies to improve HIV prevention through universal, comprehensive SHS to identify patients for PrEP. Overcoming barriers to SHS and PrEP, particularly in clinical settings such as FQHCs that care for vulnerable populations, may improve identification, prevention, and treatment of HIV and aid in ending the HIV epidemic.

Hospitalization is a missed opportunity for HIV screening, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization is a "reachable moment" for people who inject drugs (PWID), but preventive care including HIV testing, prevention and treatment is rarely offered within inpatient settings. METHODS: We conducted a multisite, retrospective cohort study of patients with opioid use disorder with infectious complications of injection drug use hospitalized between 1/1/2018-12/31/2018. We evaluated HIV care continuum outcomes using descriptive statistics and hypothesis tests for intergroup differences. RESULTS: 322 patients were included. Of 300 patients without known HIV, only 2 had a documented discussion of PrEP, while only 1 was prescribed PrEP on discharge. Among the 22 people with HIV (PWH), only 13 (59%) had a viral load collected during admission of whom all were viremic and 10 (45%) were successfully linked to care post-discharge. Rates of readmission, Medicaid or uninsured status, and unstable housing were high in both groups. DISCUSSION: We observed poor provision of HIV testing, PrEP and other HIV services for hospitalized PWID across multiple U.S. medical centers. Future initiatives should focus on providing this group with comprehensive HIV testing and treatment services through a status neutral approach.

Implementation evaluation of a teledermatology virtual clinic at an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to use the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) and the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks to evaluate implementation of TD at Duke. METHODS: The EPIS and RE-AIM frameworks were deployed to design and implement a TD program that leveraged the strengths of the Duke University Health System and addressed previously reported barriers to implementation of store-and-forward and synchronous TD models. In the resultant hybrid TD model, trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent e-comm referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. These e-consults were reviewed asynchronously and patients were scheduled for a synchronous video visit with dermatology within days. Dermatologists managed the patient plan. This hybrid TD model was piloted at four primary care clinics. Pertinent outcomes from a TD-adapted RE-AIM framework were tracked using electronic health record data. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a post-video visit survey (n = 18). Implementation barriers and facilitators were also collected through provider surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). RESULTS: At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022, there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 ± 0.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: The use of implementation science frameworks allowed for identification of system and contextual strengths which informed the hybrid TD pilot. Barriers and facilitating interventions will provide guidance for expansion and ongoing maintenance of TD.

Patient and Clinician Sociodemographics and Sexual History Screening at a Multisite Federally Qualified Health Center: A Mixed Methods Study.

PURPOSE: In 2018, there were 68 million sexually transmitted infections in the United States. Sexual history screening is an evidence-based practice endorsed by guidelines to identify risk of these infections and adverse sexual health outcomes. In this mixed methods study, we investigated patient- and clinician-level characteristics associated with receipt of sexual history screening, and contextualized these differences in more depth. METHODS: We collected sociodemographics of patients from the electronic health record and sociodemographics of their primary care clinicians via a census survey. Semistructured interviews were conducted with key practice staff. We conducted multilevel crossed random effects logistic regression analysis and thematic analysis on quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 53,246 patients and 56 clinicians from 13 clinical sites participated. Less than one-half (42.4%) of the patients had any sexual history screening documented in their health record. Patients had significantly higher odds of documented screening if they were gay or lesbian (OR = 1.23), were cisgender women (OR = 1.10), or had clinicians who were cisgender women (OR = 1.80). Conversely, patients' odds of documented screening fell significantly with age (OR per year = 0.99) and with the number of patients their clinicians had on their panels (OR per patient = 0.99), and their odds were significantly lower if their primary language was not English (OR = 0.91). In interviews, key staff expressed discomfort discussing sexual health and noted assumptions about patients who are older, in long-term relationships, or from other cultures. Discordance of patient-clinician gender and patients' sexual orientation were also noted as barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to address the interplay between the social and contextual factors identified in this study, especially those that elicited discomfort, and the implementation of sexual history screening.

Associations Between Sexual History Documentation in Electronic Health Records and Referral to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Navigator on Prescription of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis at a Multi-Site Federally Qualified Health Center.

This cross-sectional study examined the relationships between sexual history screening (SHS) and referrals to a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) navigator (non-clinical staff member who assists patients in overcoming structural barriers to PrEP) on the proportion of days covered by PrEP for adult patients at a federally qualified health center. Patients' sociodemographics, PrEP prescriptions, referral to a PrEP navigator, and SHS data were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR). The analytic sample was 214 adult patients who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative and taking PrEP to prevent infection from January 2016 to December 2019. Mixed-effects negative binomial models were conducted accounting for clustering by patients' primary care providers. Documentation of SHS was associated with a higher proportion of days covered by PrEP (incidence rate ratio = 1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.77). There was no significant effect of having a referral to the PrEP navigator on the proportion of days covered by PrEP, nor did having a referral to the PrEP navigator moderate the relationship between having SHS documented in the EHR and the proportion of days covered by PrEP. This study is the first to investigate the relationship between having sexual history documented in the EHR, referrals to a PrEP navigator, and their combined effect on the proportion of days covered by PrEP. Results of this study provide foundational evidence for future studies examining SHS as an opportunity to improve PrEP access and adherence and indicate the need for additional research exploring the value of PrEP navigators as an implementation strategy to overcome social and structural barriers to care.

Delivery of the HIV Service and Telemedicine Through Effective Patient-Reported Outcomes (+STEP) Intervention to Increase Screening and Treatment of Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders for People Living With HIV in Alabama: Protocol for an Effectiveness-Implementation Study.

BACKGROUND: The syndemic of mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs) is common among persons living with HIV and jeopardizes HIV treatment adherence, engagement in care, and viral load suppression. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs), completed through tablet or computer, and telemedicine are evidence- and technology-based interventions that have been used to successfully increase screening and treatment, respectively, a model that holds promise for persons living with HIV. To date, there is limited guidance on implementing ePROs and telemedicine into HIV clinical practice even though it is well known that these evidence-based tools improve diagnosis and access to care. OBJECTIVE: To address this, we aim to conduct a multicomponent intervention for persons living with HIV, including the delivery of HIV services and telemedicine through effective ePROs (+STEP), to increase screening and treatment of MH and SUD in Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP)-funded clinics in Alabama. METHODS: Through this intervention, we will conduct a readiness, acceptability, and accessibility assessment and implement +STEP to improve the diagnosis and treatment of MH and SUD at RWHAP clinics in Alabama. To describe implementation strategies that address barriers to the uptake of +STEP in RWHAP clinics, we will conduct qualitative interviews in years 1 (early implementation), 2 (scale up), and 4 (maintenance) with patients and key staff to evaluate barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies. Our Results will enable us to modify strategies to enhance +STEP penetration over time and inform the implementation blueprint, which we will develop for both RWHAP clinics in Alabama and future sites. We will assess the impact of implementing +STEP on diagnoses, referrals, and health care use related to MH, SUD, and HIV by comparing clinical outcomes from patients receiving these interventions (ePROs and telemedicine) with historical controls. RESULTS: The first study site began implementation in April 2022. A total of 2 additional sites have initiated ePROs. Final results are expected in 2026. The results of this study will provide a foundation for future research expanding access to ePROs for improved diagnosis linked to telemedicine access to accelerate patients along the continuum of care from MH and SUD diagnosis to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving the end of the HIV epidemic in the United States necessitates programs that accelerate movement across the MH and SUD care continuum from diagnosis to treatment for persons living with HIV. Scaling these services represents a path toward improved treatment outcomes with both individual health and population-level prevention benefits of sustained HIV viral suppression in the era of undetectable=untransmittable (U=U). This study will address this evidence gap through the evaluation of the implementation of +STEP to establish the necessary systems and processes to screen, identify, and better treat substance use and MH for people living with HIV. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40470.

A Study Protocol to Increase Engagement in Evidence Based Hospital and Community Based Care Using a Serious Injection Related Infections (SIRI) Checklist and Enhanced Peer for Hospitalized PWID (ShaPe).

Background: With the opioid crisis, surging methamphetamine use, and healthcare disruptions due to SARS-CoV-2, serious injection related infections (SIRIs), like endocarditis, have increased significantly. Hospitalizations for SIRI provide a unique opportunity for persons who inject drugs (PWID) to engage in addiction treatment and infection prevention, yet many providers miss opportunities for evidence-based care due to busy inpatient services and lack of awareness. To improve hospital care, we developed a 5-item SIRI Checklist for providers as a standardized reminder to offer medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), HIV and HCV screening, harm reduction counseling, and referral to community-based care. We also formalized an Intensive Peer Recovery Coach protocol to support PWID on discharge. We hypothesized that the SIRI Checklist and Intensive Peer Intervention would increase use of hospital-based services (HIV, HCV screening, MOUD) and linkage to community-based care: PrEP prescription, MOUD prescription, and related outpatient visit(s). Methods: This is a feasibility study and randomized control trial of a checklist and intensive peer intervention for hospitalized PWID with SIRI admitted to UAB Hospital. We will recruit 60 PWID who will be randomized to one of 4 groups (SIRI Checklist, SIRI Checklist + Enhanced Peer, Enhanced Peer, and Standard of Care). Results will be analyzed using a 2x2 factorial design. We will use surveys to collect data on drug use behaviors, stigma, HIV risk, and PrEP interest and awareness. Our primary outcome of feasibility will include the ability to recruit hospitalized PWID and retain them in the study to determine post-discharge clinical outcomes. Additionally, we will explore clinical outcomes using a combination of patient surveys and electronic medical record data (HIV, HCV testing, MOUD and PrEP prescriptions).This study is approved by UAB IRB #300009134. Discussion: This feasibility study is a necessary step in designing and testing patient-centered interventions to improve public health for rural and Southern PWID. By testing low barrier interventions that are accessible and reproducible in states without access to Medicaid expansion and robust public health infrastructure, we aim to identify models of care that promote linkage and engagement in community care. Trial Registration: NCT05480956.

Telemedicine for unhealthy alcohol use in adults living with HIV in Alabama using common elements treatment approach: A hybrid clinical efficacy-implementation trial protocol.

Background: Unhealthy alcohol use is an unaddressed barrier to achieving and maintaining control of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic. Integrated screening, treatment of common behavioral and mental health comorbidities, and telemedicine can improve alcohol treatment and HIV clinical and quality of life outcomes for rural and underserved populations. Objective: In a randomized controlled clinical trial, we will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of telephone-delivered Common Elements Treatment Approach (T-CETA), a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy protocol, on unhealthy alcohol use, HIV, other substance use and mental health outcomes among predominantly rural adults with HIV receiving care at community clinics in Alabama. Methods: Adults with HIV receiving care at four selected community clinics in Alabama will receive a telephone-delivered alcohol brief intervention (BI), and then be assigned at random (stratified by clinic and sex) to no further intervention or T-CETA. Participants will be recruited after screening positively for unhealthy alcohol use or when referred by a provider. The target sample size is 308. The primary outcome will be change in the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) at six- and 12-months post-enrollment. Additional outcomes include HIV (retention in care and viral suppression), patient-reported mental health (anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress), and quality of life. A range of implementation measures be evaluated including T-CETA provider and client acceptability, feasibility, cost and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: This trial will inform alcohol treatment within HIV care programs, including the need to consider comorbidities, and the potential impact of alcohol interventions on HIV and quality of life outcomes.

Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center.

Background: Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. Methods: We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). Results: At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. Conclusions: Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD.

Methamphetamines and Serious Injection-Related Infections: Opioid Use Care Continuum and Opportunities to End Alabama's Drug Crisis.

Background: Increasingly, injection opioid use and opioid use disorder (OUD) are complicated by methamphetamine use, but the impact of stimulant use on the care of people who inject drugs (PWID) with serious injection-related infections (SIRIs) is unknown. The objective of this study was to explore hospital outcomes and postdischarge trends for a cohort of hospitalized PWID to identify opportunities for intervention. Methods: We queried the electronic medical record for patients hospitalized at the University of Alabama at Birmingham with injection drug use-related infections between 1/11/2016 and 4/24/2021. Patients were categorized as having OUD only (OUD), OUD plus methamphetamine use (OUD/meth), or injection of other substance(s) (other). We utilized statistical analyses to assess group differences across hospital outcomes and postdischarge trends. We determined the OUD continuum of care for those with OUD, with and without methamphetamine use. Results: A total of 370 patients met inclusion criteria-many with readmissions (98%) and high mortality (8%). The majority were White, male, and uninsured, with a median age of 38. One in 4 resided outside of a metropolitan area. There were significant differences according to substance use in terms of sociodemographics and hospital outcomes: patients with OUD/meth were more likely to leave via patient-directed discharge, but those with OUD only had the greatest mortality. Comorbid methamphetamine use did not significantly impact the OUD care continuum. Conclusions: The current drug crisis in AL will require targeted interventions to engage a young, uninsured population with SIRI in evidence-based addiction and infection services.

Physicians' experiences with buprenorphine: A qualitative study of motivations for becoming X waivered and barriers to and facilitators of prescribing the medication for opioid use disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Buprenorphine can only be prescribed for opioid use disorder (OUD) by providers with a Controlled Substance Act waiver (X waiver) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. This study examines what motivates physicians to become X waivered, as well as what facilitates and hinders physicians' abilities to prescribe buprenorphine to people with OUD. METHODS: This is a qualitative study of physicians in Birmingham, Alabama. We recruited physicians from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Cahaba Medical Care to participate in semi-structured interviews and used a Framework-guided Rapid Qualitative Analysis technique to analyze the transcripts for themes aligned with the Social Cognitive Theory. RESULTS: A total of 27 physicians were interviewed between December 15th, 2021 and July 21st, 2022. The vast majority reported seeking to obtain an X waiver when their employers encouraged or mandated it. Most providers reported being eager to become waivered when first asked by their employers, while a few described some hesitancies. Essentially all participants agreed that having mentors is important when first prescribing buprenorphine and that support from social workers and counselors is needed. Most physicians discussed how stigma, administrative barriers, and a lack of community resources hinder buprenorphine prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that employers are effective in encouraging X waiver certification and mentors and allied health professionals are important in ensuring providers continue buprenorphine prescription. Additionally, it is critical to address challenges to successful buprenorphine prescription, like stigma and administrative barriers.

Harm Reduction Principles in a Street Medicine Program: A Qualitative Study.

There is ample evidence that homelessness is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Street Medicine seeks to eliminate these disparities by providing healthcare on the streets to people who are unsheltered. While extant research describes health disparities for the unsheltered and programmatic approaches to addressing housing instability, there are few published studies describing how healthcare providers build and maintain relationships with patients on the street. This insight is central to specifying how street medicine differs from traditional forms of care and defining aspects of street medicine that contribute to successful patient engagement. Through a collaboration between Operation Safety Net (OSN), a street medicine provider in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and [name redacted], an exploratory qualitative study was designed and implemented using harm reduction principles as a guiding framework. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eleven OSN street medicine providers and a thematic analysis using a deductive approach was used to analyze the data. Findings identified the ways that relational harm reduction was central to all aspects of patient care provided through this program. Major themes included: (1) individualism, or meeting patients where they are figuratively and literally; (2) humanism, which refers to valuing and holding true regard for patients; and (3) nonjudgmental care, in which providers do not hold negative attitudes toward patients and their decisions. These themes are consistent with relational principles of harm reduction. Challenges that were discussed also aligned with these principles and included frustration with systems providing care that did not meet patients' individualized needs, and pain and trauma experienced by providers upon losing patients for whom they genuinely cared. Understanding these relational principles of harm reduction may help providers operationalize ways to effectively engage and maintain homeless patients in care and subsequently bridge the gap to traditional models of care. This study may provide valuable insights to expand the street medicine field in research and applied clinical and community settings.

Qualitative inquiry into barriers and facilitators to transforming primary care for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in US federally qualified health centres.

OBJECTIVES: Health systems must rapidly move knowledge into practice to address disparities impacting sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients. This qualitative study explores barriers and facilitators that arose during an initiative to improve care for SGM patients in federally qualified health centres (FQHCs) from the perspectives of FQHC staff. DESIGN: Cross-sectional qualitative content analysis, using a general inductive approach, of secondary data from transcripts of intervention events offered to FQHC staff and semistructured interviews with staff and FQHC leadership during the intervention. SETTING: 10 FQHCs from nine states in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: FQHC quality improvement (QI) and clinical care staff, and leaders at each FQHC. INTERVENTIONS: The transforming care for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people QI initiative combined two evidence-based programmes, Learning Collaborative (LC) and Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO), to assist primary care health centres in developing capacity to identify SGM patients, monitor their health and care, and improve disparities. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was identification of barriers and facilitators to implementing initiatives to improve care for SGM patients. The secondary outcome was clarification of how intervention participants used Project ECHO sessions versus LC meetings to obtain information that influenced implementation of the initiative at their FQHC. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators mapped to two major themes: 'Clinical' (patients' health, wellness, and available treatment) and Health Systems and Institutional Culture (FQHC operations, and customs and social institutions within the FQHCs and in the external environment). Common 'Clinical' inquiries were for assistance with behavioural health, pre-exposure prophylaxis and transgender hormone therapy. Prevalent facilitators included workflow change and staff training, while adapting electronic health records for data collection, decision support and data extraction was the most prevalent barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Project ECHO and LC provided complimentary forums to explore clinical and operational changes needed to improve care for SGM at FQHCs.

Identifying facilitators, barriers, and strategies to implement social determinants of health screening, referral, and follow-up in the US: a scoping review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This review will assess the literature exploring facilitators, barriers, and strategies for the implementation of social determinants of health and social needs screening, referral to community resources, and follow-up in clinical settings and clinical training curricula in the United States. INTRODUCTION: Social determinants of health and social needs are a central cause of health inequity and poor health outcomes in the United States. Existing research primarily focuses on theoretical implications of social determinants of health on health outcomes, with a growing secondary focus on the development of screening tools that identify patients' specific unmet social needs. However, summative research has not yet focused on the barriers, facilitators, and strategies relating to the implementation of social determinants of health and social need screenings into routine clinical care. This scoping review aims to examine literature on the implementation of social determinants of health and social needs screening in clinical settings and clinical training curricula while also identifying gaps that require further exploration. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include relevant studies examining the facilitators, barriers, and strategies for the implementation of social determinants of health and social needs screening, referral, and follow-up as they relate to human subjects. The literature must be in English from 2010 and focus on United States clinical health settings and curricula. METHODS: We will search PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases for relevant articles. Two independent reviewers will screen abstracts for eligibility. Data will be extracted from eligible articles and results will be presented in narrative and tabular format in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Gaming Preferences and Motivations Among Bullied Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: An Interview Study.

Objective: Game-based interventions can easily disseminate health information to hard-to-reach populations, such as sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY; e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, and transgender youth). SGMY disproportionately experience health problems, which have been attributed to greater violence victimization, such as bullying. Nevertheless, few interventions exist to improve health outcomes for bullied SGMY. Since game-based interventions offer economically viable and easily scalable solutions, we explored why bullied SGMY play games, the gaming characteristics they enjoy, and their preferences for future game-based interventions. Materials and Methods: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 20 14- to 18-year-old U.S.-residing bullied SGMY recruited from social media. We asked participants about their current gaming experiences, preferences, and suggestions for future games and then conducted thematic analysis. Results: The majority of SGMY reported playing games to experience positive feelings associated with higher degrees of agency. Through controlling in-game storyline and character customization settings, SGMY described feeling safe and engaged in game play. In addition, SGMY reported playing games as a distraction from the real world. Coping with stress and other negative emotions was a commonly reported motivation for playing games, as was gleaning happiness independent from stress management. Furthermore, SGMY mentioned using games to connect with people, both in-person and virtually, to develop and maintain friendships. Conclusion: This study highlights specific methods of tailoring games to the interests of bullied SGMY. In addition, our findings are preliminary indicators that SGMY may use games to achieve healthy psychosocial developmental milestones. This study may be integral in informing the development of future game-based interventions for SGMY.

Transforming Primary Care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: A Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative.

PURPOSE: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people experience multiple disparities in access to care and health outcomes. We developed a quality improvement initiative, Transforming Primary Care for LGBT People, to enhance the capacity of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to provide culturally affirming care for this population. METHODS: The 1-year intervention blended the models of Practice Improvement Collaboratives and Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes) to facilitate learning and translate knowledge into action. FQHC teams received coaching in creating LGBT-inclusive environments, collecting sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data, taking risk-based sexual histories, and screening LGBT people for syphilis, chlamydia and gonorrhea, and HIV. We used a preintervention-postintervention evaluation design. RESULTS: We selected 10 FQHCs serving 441,387 patients in 123 clinical sites in 9 states. The intervention spread from 10 clinicians in 10 clinical sites to 431 clinicians in 79 clinical sites. FQHCs reported increases in culturally affirming practices, including collecting patient pronoun information (42.9% increase) and identifying LGBT patient liaisons (300.0% increase). Postintervention, among 9 FQHCs reporting SOGI data from electronic health records, SOGI documentation increased from 13.5% to 50.8% of patients (276.3% increase). Among 8 FQHCs reporting number of LGBT patients, screening of LGBT patients increased from 22.3% (95% CI, 4.9%-40.0%) to 34.6% (95% CI, 19.4%-48.6%) for syphilis (86.5% increase); from 25.3% (95% CI, 7.6%-43.1%) to 44.1% (95% CI, 30.2%-58.1%) for chlamydia and gonorrhea (109.0% increase); and from 14.8% (95% CI, 3.2%-26.5%) to 30.5% (95% CI, 26.7%-34.3%) for HIV (132.4% increase). CONCLUSIONS: FQHCs participating in this initiative reported improved capacity to provide culturally affirming care and targeted screening for LGBT patients.

Illicit and Prescription Drug Misuse among Sexual Minority Women in the United States: A Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Background: The United States Institute of Medicine (IOM) published reports in 1999 and 2011 identifying drug use as a priority area for sexual minority health research, specifically focused on mechanisms contributing to drug use disparities and the development of tailored interventions. Limited research has prioritized sexual minority women (SMW) with the majority of substance use research among sexual minorities focused on adolescents and men who have sex with men. This scoping review will characterize the research literature related to illicit drug use and prescription drug misuse among SMW and sub-groups within the SMW population. Through this, we will identify: (1) specific substances used; (2) patterns of substance use; (3) risk and protective factors; (4) prevention interventions; and (5) drug treatment programs specific to SMW. Methods/Design: This review will include studies with empirical data of illicit or prescription drug misuse among sexual minority women. Peer-reviewed quantitative research conducted in the United States and published in English from 2011-Present will be included. We will search Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases for relevant articles. Two independent reviewers will screen abstracts and relevant full-text studies for eligibility. Data will be extracted from eligible articles and results will be presented in narrative and tabular form as appropriate. Discussion: This work will identify gaps of knowledge in the research pertaining to illicit or prescription drug misuse among sexual minority women since the 2011 US IOM report. As a result of this work, we will propose directions for future research to address identified gaps.